---

統一也都說是上游廠商害他們用到有問題的食品
看來三星有學到真傳XDD


http://www.businessweekly.com.tw/KBlogArticle.aspx?ID=5058&pnumber=1

洩密還死不承認，拆穿三星的狡辯話術

在之前一篇文章中，我提到三星的律師將蘋果與 Nokia、Sharp、Phillips、以及 Ericsso
n 的機密合約內容洩露給三星的高層，引起了軒然大波。



這個紕漏非常大，讓三星不但在商場談判上佔有很大優勢，在訴訟上也盡知對方底牌。蘋
果當然非常不開心，因此要求三星回答以下幾個基本問題：

          哪些三星高層知道了這四份合約內容？（Who）
          什麼時候知道的？（When）
          如何知道的？（How）
          知道了之後，拿去作了什麼？（What）
          有哪些其他國家的三星律師，在其他案件中也利用了這四份合約內容？





三星安博士的證詞





在這兩段證詞中，安博士試圖說明他沒做錯事。這份文件很適合說明修辭學的重要性，我
把它翻譯成中文如下，另外穿插註解。粗體都是我加的。




律師的精心傑作－－絕對真實

在分析這兩段話之前，需要先知道兩個背景：





但陳述事實（truth）不等於陳述所有的事實（whole truth）。




修辭學的美妙

果訴訟的外部律師收到了蘋果/ Nokia 協議內容，因為那不是真的，同時因為這樣說很蠢
。」（按：Mr. Melin 是 Nokia 方談判代表）

「22. I am certain that I did not tell Mr. Melin at the June 4, 2013 meeting
that I received Apple/Nokia licensing terms from my outside counsel in the
Apple/Samsung case, because it is not true, and because it would be a very
foolish thing to say.  




蘋果指控三星的律師把蘋果的機密文件放在 FTP 上，任由三星的高層下載；因此就算安博
士不是直接從律師手中拿到，而是間接透過其他人獲得，也不影響洩密的嚴重性。






"I hold a J.D. from an American law school, Santa Clara University, and until
I moved to Korea approximately ten years ago I was a member of the California
Bar. I am well aware of the importance of protective orders in United States
litigation. I have been responsible directly or indirectly for the supervision
of hundreds of patent litigations. In most, if not all of them, a protective
order is entered. These invariably cover license terms which I know from
experience are highly confidential and sensitive information. The
confidentiality of this type of license information is as important to Samsung
 as it is to any other technology company."



題。






It would be incredibly reckless for me to have made such a comment to Nokia. It
would amount to my admitting to an adversary that our outside counsel and Samsung
had violated a protective order protecting the adversary’s information and
that I was attempting to use the information gained by such a violation to
negotiate license terms. The idea that I would violate a protective order is
simply wrong, and the idea that I would tell my adversary that I and my outside
counsel had violated it and furthermore were violating it in that very instance
by trying to profit from its use is preposterous. [REDACTED]




最後，安博士說他不可能跟對手承認他和他的律師違反了保護令，這顯然也是真實的－－
誰會沒事在談判時說自己違反了保護令啊。




幾年前三星跟另一家公司簽了一個秘密的和解協議，但不久之後似乎所有產業內的人都知
道了協議內容的例子。」

23. I may have used the word 『leak' at the June 4th, 2013 meeting with Nokia
, or some other word to reference the idea that all information gets out,
though I don't recall the precise phrase I used. I do believe that there may
have been some sort of leak due to the contemporaneous media reports outlining
 the terms of the Apple-Nokia license. But I cannot be certain of this. It has
 in fact been my own experience that information gets out. I know this from my
 own experience and I recounted to Mr. Melin a situation a few years ago where
 Samsung had entered into a confidential settlement with another company and
very shortly thereafter everyone in the industry seemed to know it."





安博士只說他不確定機密內容是從哪裡得到的。『好像是媒體吧？我不確定耶。』



結語




--
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 42.75.253.246
※ 編輯: isoxxxxx        來自: 42.75.253.246        (10/28 10:49)

--