顯示廣告
隱藏 ✕
※ 本文為 MindOcean 轉寄自 ptt.cc 更新時間: 2019-03-26 21:40:37
看板 HatePolitics
作者 oftisa (oo)
標題 Fw: [新聞] China's Worst Nightmare: A U.S. Milita
時間 Tue Mar 26 16:39:05 2019


※ [本文轉錄自 Gossiping 看板 #1ScUKMbL ]

看板 Gossiping
作者 oftisa (oo)
標題 Re: [新聞] China's Worst Nightmare: A U.S. Milita
時間 Tue Mar 26 16:38:44 2019


這個問題我講過很多次了,就是台灣要整合地方行政區
配合建立研究型大學

合併為
台北縣(北基宜、馬祖)、新竹縣(桃竹苗)、台中縣(中彰投、金門)、台南縣(雲嘉南)
高雄縣(高屏澎)、花蓮縣、台東縣

直接把金門、馬祖併入台灣地方行政區就好了,根本不需要使用福建省的名義
這樣就解決了本篇的問題

最重要的是人才沒有這麼多,卻分割成這麼多行政區,各地方政府都是一堆蠢材
不做事,只會混吃等死,能撈救撈、能混就混
小聯盟就不應該到大聯盟打球,現在大聯盟的球隊太多,自然表現很差

一切的問題出自於中華民國/中國國民黨敗逃台灣,為了分得更多官位,讓更多人做官
所以把已經完善的行政區割裂成小塊,分贓官位,才造成台灣現在的問題


另外一點就是台灣的醫療、教育都應該平均分配
當然所謂的平均不像糖融入水裡這麼平均,還是要找重點區域
個縣裡都要找一個政策指定都市,當成發展重點,並且將成果擴及、帶動全縣

以全國的觀點來說這就是平均發展

而各縣也要設立一個重點、頂尖、研究型大學,而且要有醫學院
組成台灣大學系統NTU System

NTU台北大學(台大)人數太多,應該縮減為兩萬人
NTU新竹大學(清交合併)合併後也縮減到兩萬人
至於NTU台中大學(中興)、NTU花蓮大學、NTU台東大學則可以增加到兩萬人
NTU高雄大學(合併中山、高大、高醫大)合併後差不多兩萬人

而且都有醫學院,提升各地平均壽命
才不會有柯文哲說的,台東人的平均壽命比台北人少8.5歲的亂象


至於美軍要在太平島駐軍也可以,美國先出面要求菲律賓把大業島、巴丹島還給台灣
不要讓菲律賓侵占台灣的領土了,到時候時間救了就拿不回來了

能歸還大業島、巴丹島的話,美國要駐軍很歡迎


※ 引述《Pegasus170 (魯蛇肥宅台勞+前義務役)》之銘言:
: 1.媒體來源:
: ※ 例如蘋果日報、自由時報
: The National Interest
: 2.完整新聞標題:
: ※ 標題沒有完整寫出來 ---> 依照板規刪除文章
: China's Worst Nightmare: A U.S. Military Presence on Taiwan?
: 3.完整新聞內文:
: ※ 社論特稿都不能貼! 違者刪除(政治類水桶3個月),貼廣告也會被刪除喔!
: Stratfor Worldview
: Security, Asia
: Could it happen?
: China's Worst Nightmare: A U.S. Military Presence on Taiwan?
: Enhanced security cooperation between Taiwan and the United States could
: easily expand as the pair work to balance against China's increased military
: presence in the Taiwan Strait and the South China Sea. On Nov. 5, Taiwanese
: Defense Minister Yen Teh-fa told legislators that his government would
: consider allowing the U.S. Navy access to Taiping Island if Washington
: requested it. The remark is by no means conclusive, though Yen emphasized
: that the United States could be granted access for humanitarian or regional
: security operations if they aligned with Taiwan's interests.
: Allowing the United States access to the island would further challenge the
: status quo at a time when the U.S. Navy is stepping up its presence in the
: Taiwan Strait. Over the past few months, U.S. warships have twice passed
: through the Taiwan Strait in a possible attempt to standardize patrols there
: or even pave the way for an aircraft carrier group to transit through. And in
: October, a U.S. Navy research ship docked in Taiwan's southern port city of
: Kaohsiung for refueling. Moreover, Taiwanese media has speculated that U.S.
: vessels will dock in Taiwan as part of naval exercises that are expected to
: occur in the region this month. However, U.S. Chief of Naval Operations Adm.
: John Richardson declined to confirm or deny such a possibility.
: Background
: Taiping, one of two islands Taiwan controls in the South China Sea, is the
: largest naturally occurring Spratly Island; 1.4 kilometers long and 400 meters
: wide (.87 miles and .25 miles, respectively). The island sits 1,600 kilometers
: away from Taiwan in the South China Sea Basin, and bears strategic importance
: as an ideal location from which to secure sea lanes and establish a presence
: in the disputed region. Thanks to its strategic location and resources -
: Taiping possesses ample fisheries and is the only one of the Spratly Islands
: with an indigenous supply of fresh water ? the island has served as an
: important logistics base.
: Why It Matters
: A U.S. military presence on Taiping Island or on Taiwan itself would be a
: serious provocation for China, which regards Taiwan as a wayward province and
: views U.S. relations with Taipei as a threat to Chinese sovereignty. Beijing
: has lodged stern protests against previous dockings and passages, and even
: threatened military action against Taiwan if a U.S. warship arrived in
: Kaohsiung. And China is also highly sensitive to the possibility that Taiwan
: will alter Taiping's status quo. Beijing and Taipei have largely overlapping
: maritime claims, and China is hoping Taiwan's control over Taiping will
: buttress its territorial claims in the South China Sea after Beijing attains
: its desired goal of reunifying Taiwan with mainland China. But while Beijing's
: hopes are high, its fears are equally strong that Taipei would be unable to
: defend Taiping against invasion or would allow Chinese rivals such as the
: United States or Vietnam greater access to Taiping Island.
: But while Beijing sees Taiwan through the lens of its plans in the South China
: Sea, Taipei views Chinese expansion as its greatest challenge. Taiwan has been
: working for years to expand its facilities, fortify its infrastructure and
: increase military exercises to counter China's expanding influence. Chinese
: military pressure against Taiwan has grown over the past two years, potentiall
: y
: spurring Taiwan's government to view cooperation with the United States as a
: convenient way to secure its control over Taiping and further prioritize its
: goal of countering China's military might in the Taiwan Strait. Unlike its
: predecessors, Taiwan's current government is less concerned with war legacies,
: and many Taiwanese citizens see little economic value in Taiping, prompting
: some scholars to even suggest leasing Taiping to the U.S military - an
: explosive move that would be certain to infuriate Beijing and escalate
: tensions.
: Access to Taiping would give the United States greater mobility in the South
: China Sea, as well as provide ammunition for rivals such as Vietnam or the
: Philippines to undermine Beijing's territorial claims. An agreement on U.S.
: access to the island is by no means finalized, but the perceived challenge
: would likely prompt China to increase its own military presence in the region
: and ramp up pressure against Taiwan. If that happens, the animosity between
: Chinese and U.S. forces in the region will intensify, and close encounters
: between their respective vessels - and even interceptions - can be expected to
: increase.
: U.S., Taiwan: Washington Ponders a Military Presence on a Taiwanese Island is
: republished with the permission of Stratfor Worldview, a geopolitical
: intelligence and advisory firm.
: Image: Reuters
: 4.完整新聞連結 (或短網址):
: ※ 當新聞連結過長時,需提供短網址方便網友點擊
: https://news.yahoo.com/chinas-worst-nightmare-u-military-202800952.html
: https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/chinas-worst-nightmare-us-military-pres
Blog | The National Interest
Debating the issues: China, Russia, Iran, National Security, Defense, War & Peace, International Relations & U.S. Politics. Realism is our guide. ...

 
: en
: 5.備註:
: ※ 一個人一天只能張貼一則新聞,被刪或自刪也算額度內,超貼者水桶,請注意
: 大家還記得這篇新聞吧:
: #1RueEFAc (Gossiping)
: 現在這篇是從那篇之後更新的分析延伸,直接點出太平島的價值跟越南及菲律賓如何看待
: .以下是本篇英文新聞綜合摘要跟分析:
: 實際上,長久以來,中國利用所謂”中華民國”對南中國海的主權宣示來合理化自己也可
: 以繼承同等權益,而當台灣這個”中華民國”獨佔太平島的同時,中國不但可以根據所謂
: ”繼承中華民國”這個觀點宣稱台灣政府這邊的所有領土權益,也可以利用太平島把其他
: 國家權益排除.當然,另一個綁死台灣台灣跟中國臍帶的,就是”福建省”金門縣跟連江
: 縣(馬祖).如果今天台灣讓美國軍方使用太平島,除了表示台灣自身的國家地位,也同
: 時將過去國民政府以來的南中國海十一段線/九段線宣稱給徹底揚棄.這等於把台灣跟中
: 國的領土臍帶給逐步割斷-另一個就是金馬,本來金馬都隸屬於”福建省”,如果拿掉”
: 福建省”,對台灣來說,等同切斷臍帶,直接把”中華民國是台灣”落實化,金馬不必經
: 過所謂的回歸/獨立處分,直接視為台灣這個國家的一分子.就跟台灣放棄南中國海全部
: 主權,而以一個不同國家的姿態只聲保東沙群島跟太平島主權.
: 同樣的,一旦美軍可以使用太平島,在延續上一段的內容下,等於直接打破中國透過吃”
: 中華民國”豆腐來宣稱南中國海的主權.這對菲律賓跟越南來說,不但歡迎也是一勞永逸
: 的解決方案.實際上這兩國並不是真心在乎太平島在台灣手上,而是中國利用台灣這個”
: 中華民國”來吃盡豆腐.一旦台灣自己割掉這個繼承1911版中華民國而轉變成
: 1950版中華民國,那中國跟台灣就是兩個分開的國家,兩邊都無權宣稱整片南中國海
: ,只能宣告自己佔領的礁岩島嶼.而身為唯一可以供應淡水且具有完整生態系的太平島,
: 也會在美國的監控影響之下.
: 另一個重點是,一旦美軍可以公開使用太平島,等於替美軍駐台掃除了形式障礙,讓未來
: 美軍可以光明正大在台美合作之下進駐台灣.雖然說中國絕對會生氣,但是因為這幾年中
: 國擴張的侵略意圖太過鮮明,美軍駐紮使用台灣下轄領土設施反而是最有效且便宜牽制中
: 國跟維護東亞及東南亞和平的手段.
: 此外,在台灣人眼中,太平島是一個幾乎毫無經濟價值的島嶼,所以讓美軍使用太平島對
: 台灣內部來說阻力非常的小,這也是最快合理化駐軍台灣的一條道路.
: 補充,說到美國人怎樣看中國以下這篇文章中的一個留言最貼切:
: https://tinyurl.com/y6dw3dwe
China says hopes world provides 'constructive' help to Venezuela
[圖]
China hopes that the international community can provide "constructive" help to Venezuela based on respect for the country's sovereignty, the foreign  ...

 
: China has absolutely mastered the art of saying a lot without saying anything
: at
: 好了,本文摘要跟個人心得在此.希望各位看倌滿意.
: Have a Nice Weekend

--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 219.68.209.51
※ 文章代碼(AID): #1ScUKMbL (Gossiping)
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Gossiping/M.1553589526.A.955.html

※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
※ 轉錄者: oftisa (219.68.209.51), 03/26/2019 16:39:05

--
※ 看板: HatePolitics 文章推薦值: 0 目前人氣: 0 累積人氣: 17 
分享網址: 複製 已複製
r)回覆 e)編輯 d)刪除 M)收藏 ^x)轉錄 同主題: =)首篇 [)上篇 ])下篇